A. INTRODUCTION

If you unlocked , you probably no longer have many worthless/sub-local optimum bound attachments.

Of course, the unlocked mind is an atheistic one. (Atheism: disbelief, or lack of belief in God or gods)

More pertinently , the unlocked mind is a mind with no beliefs !

B. BEYOND THE 'UNLOCKED' MIND

B.I - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EXCEEDS MANKIND IN MANY COGNITIVE TASKS

Life's meaning probably occurs on the horizon of optimization

http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/mit-physicist-proposes-new-meaning-of-life

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-meaning-of-life-85/answer/Jordan-Bennett-9

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv6UVOQ0F44

Today, artificial intelligence exceeds mankind in many human, cognitive tasks:

Can we build ai without loosing control over it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nt3edWLgIg

Will artificial intelligence take your job?:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_-wn8ghcoY

Humans need not apply:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU

The wonderful and terrifying implications of computers that can learn:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4kyRyKyOpo

B.II - MANKIND WILL PROBABLY CREATE MACHINES, WITH HUMAN-LEVEL BRAIN POWER

Now, the creation of general artificial intelligence is so far, the local optimum bound path, and mankind's largely pertinent task.

The human brain computes roughly 10^16 to 10^18 synaptic operations per second.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exascale_computing

http://www.research.ibm.com/cognitive-computing/neurosynaptic-chips.shtml

http://people.uwplatt.edu/~yangq/csse411/csse411-materials/s13/cs_1/brostm_AI-in-commercet.doc

Mankind has already created brain based models that achieve 10^14 of the above total (IBM etc).

If mankind isn't erased (via some catastrophe), on the horizon of Moore's Law, mankind will probably create machines, with human-level brain power (and relevantly, human-like efficiency), by at least 2020.

B.III.A - SCIENTIFIC-REDEFINITION OF GOD

In summary, probabilistically, the ability to generate non trivial intelligence (perhaps artificial), that surpasses the net intellect of one’s species, and or compute simulation of universes (with intellect resembling prior), is that which classifies said species as God-bound.

In simpler terms : God is any probably non omniscient entity with the ability to compute simulation(s) of universes (that may contain sophisticated intelligence) and or engineer non-trivial intelligence (perhaps artificial), that shall probably exceed that of the intellect of its creators.

See source i | source ii

B.III.B Why is ‘God’ scientifically redefinable?

(a) Recall that humanity had not always had rigorous modern science.

(b) Recall that a cause for the universe (the typical archaic claimed God) had been established before modern science (Digital Physics, Simulation Hypothesis, Penrose/Hawkins' singularity theorems etc)

(c) Recall that science is a medium that updates, as scientists produce new data. However, until now, the archaic science of Gods was not updated in modern science terms.

(d) For example, recall 'astronomy'. Science had updated from archaic astronomy to modern astronomy, such that mythical components were purged. The word 'astronomy' maintained regardless.

Thusly, betwixt my accord, the aforesaid update, par “god”, shall perhaps occur.

See academia.edu/31660547/A_scientific_redefinition_of_God_by_an_atheist

B.IV - YOU ARE A 'MINIMALLY-CAPABLE' GOD, HOWEVER NOT THE RELIGIOUS-OMNISCIENT TYPE

In a similar way that the hypothetical super artificial intelligence (mentioned in b.v below) engineers itself (and probably how today’s artificial neural networks update themselves), …we constantly self-engineer our brains, such that enhanced versions of ourselves are probable.

B.V - YOU CAN BECOME A 'HIGHLY-CAPABLE' GOD, HOWEVER STILL PROBABLY NOT THE RELIGIOUS-OMNISCIENT TYPE

So, mankind is gaining more and more, a specific ability, that several theistic gods are claimed to possess.

See source i | source ii

That is, the ability to generate at least human-level, artificial, non-trivial intelligence.

This is probable, given that we don't erase ourselves with war etc, or encounter some other catastrophe.

C - HOW TO BECOME A 'HIGHLY-CAPABLE' GOD

Here are three steps for how to become a highly-capable god, on the horizon of the scientific definition in b iii & b v:

https://medium.com/@jordanmicahbennett/how-to-become-a-god-in-3-simple-steps-absent-faith-belief-f95f5c16f375#.iuje6oxb7

facebook.com/nonbeliefism